View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1063 | RackTables | SNMP | public | 2013-11-04 13:53 | 2013-11-18 17:24 |
Reporter | blaza-pl | Assigned To | MWilkinson | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | 0.20.5 | ||||
Target Version | 0.20.6 | Fixed in Version | 0.20.6 | ||
Summary | 1063: Unknown OID '9.1.798' - Cisco Catalyst 2960-8TC-L | ||||
Description | '9.1.798' => array ( 'dict_key' => 165, 'text' => 'WS-C2960-8TC-L: 8 RJ-45/10-100TX + 2 combo-gig', 'processors' => array ('catalyst-chassis-1-to-2-combo-1000SFP', 'catalyst-chassis-any-1000T', 'catalyst-chassis-any-100TX'), ), | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Hi. Can you please supply an SNMP walk of the ifTable and Entity Mibs please. Looking at Cisco's published Products Mib, OID 9.1.798 is described as '8 x 10/100 ports + 1 Gigabit Ethernet port', not as 8 x 10/100Tx + 2 combo-gig ports. Regards Mark |
|
They say "1 Dual Purpose". The 'text' field needs to be fixed, but so long as existing processors do the job for this device, it would be OK to use 'processors' as given. Blazej, does that block emit proper set of ports for you? |
|
Change submitted as Pull Request #45 | |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2013-11-04 13:53 | blaza-pl | New Issue | |
2013-11-04 13:53 | blaza-pl | Status | new => assigned |
2013-11-04 13:53 | blaza-pl | Assigned To | => adoom42 |
2013-11-08 10:42 | MWilkinson | Assigned To | adoom42 => MWilkinson |
2013-11-11 09:17 | MWilkinson | Note Added: 0001933 | |
2013-11-11 09:17 | MWilkinson | Target Version | => 0.20.6 |
2013-11-12 07:54 | infrastation | Note Added: 0001939 | |
2013-11-18 10:30 | MWilkinson | Note Added: 0001955 | |
2013-11-18 17:24 | adoom42 | Status | assigned => closed |
2013-11-18 17:24 | adoom42 | Resolution | open => fixed |
2013-11-18 17:24 | adoom42 | Fixed in Version | => 0.20.6 |