2010-05-07 18:30
|
|
|
|
i am reviewing the changes and will look at getting them into the code base this week. Thanks. |
 |
Jeroen's work has been published on the list, did you look at it? |
|
|
This feature won't go into 0.18.0, please retarget it later. |
|
|
Is there an updated timeline for this issue? It is a prerequisite for us to put racktables in production at our facility, so I'm anxious to know what the status is. |
 |
The patch attached to this ticket defines a one-to-one relationship between two patch panels, and makes the assumption that they are identical (at least in regards to each having the same number of ports). I think a different port-level approach is needed. At least in my data center, there are cases where multiple 8-port PPs are connected to a single 48-port PP. Ryan Farrington is working on a patch which supports this. |
|
|
The timeline is a little pushed as we devs are talking about the actual data structure. I am actually enlisting a DBA @ the office to give me some ideas on how to best handle the implementation and upgrade path if necessary. I am still working on this so dont give up! =) |
|
|
I am targeting this to 0.19. |
|
|
Unassigned again. |
|
|
Could I ask you how to add information in RT with patchpanel ports now? It's not clear for me. I created object "Patch1" , created 8 ports. What's next? How should I link switch and server through patchpanel? |
 |
Hi timofeyl1, you could also try this plugin https://github.com/RackTables/racktables-contribs/blob/master/linkmgmt.php |
 |
I would like this. |
 |
We are on 0.20.3 and nothing of this feature. I'm waiting for it! |
 |
Is this still being worked on? We could do with the functionality in our RT install! |
|
|
I created a new 'patchpanel' branch which needs to be reviewed. Please try it out and report your findings. Summary: https://github.com/RackTables/racktables/blob/patchpanel/README.patchpanel |
|
|
Hi, I just upgrade a dev install from 0.20.3 to the patchpanel branch, upgrade seemed to work fine and im able to link ports to multiple ports and use the 'trace ports' link. all looks ok from some initial testing. Cheers |
 |
Any chance of this feature being included on 0.20.5? |
|
|
It isn't likely to make it into 0.20.5. Please post to the mailing list to stir up discussion and increase the chances it will merge into 0.20.6. |
 |
I would love to have it in 0.20.6, this feature i think is a killer for a lot of people. |
|
|
Reviewed and found OK to merge into master and add any missing finish there. I don't hold this any more. |
|
|
That's great, news!! Looking forward to use this important feature. Lot's of patchpanels to connect :) |
|
|
Hi adoom42, Does infrastation's approval makes it OK to change the issue status to "assigned"? We wouldn't want to miss the 0.20.6 window, right? :) |
 |
Will this feature be ready at 0.20.7? |
|
|
cyb3rwulf, The previous patch was found to be lacking in respect to support of some other features (CDP/LLDP, 802.1Q). There is no estimate of when the work will be completed. |
- Anonymous
