View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1535 | RackTables | default | public | 2015-11-25 01:07 | 2017-06-23 16:03 |
Reporter | bpothier | Assigned To | |||
Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
Status | acknowledged | Resolution | open | ||
Product Version | 0.20.10 | ||||
Summary | 1535: Add more support for Fibre Channel (FC) transceivers and cabling | ||||
Description | Most current Fibre Channel(FC) ports utilize the SFP style adapter to LC fiber connectors (old 1G mostly used SC fiber connectors). Common data rates include 2/4/8/16Gb (1G, 10G, 20G also exist, 32G & 128G are coming) At least for Cisco, some backwards compatibility exists: 2G - 1/2/4 4G - (1/)2/4/8/16 8G - (1/)2/4/8/16 16G - 4/8/16 There are 2 common modules: ShortWave(SW - multimode) and LongWave(LW - singlemode), with SW being more common. Some additional transceiver options include ExtendedReach(ER) and a variety of CWDM "colors" for 1/2/4/8G, but these are probably not common enough to bother with(for now?). On some Cisco models, the physical socket can be reconfigured to accept FC or ethernet SFP+ modules - e.g. Unified Ports on Nexus 5000 series . | ||||
Additional Information | Not sure if a new PortInnerInterface type is needed? e.g. FC-SFP+ / "Empty FC-SFP+", etc...? PortOuterInterface needs entries like: FC2G-SW, FC2G-LW - (SW=ShortWave/Multi Mode, LW=LongWave/Single mode) FC4G-SW, FC4G-LW FC8G-SW, FC8G-LW FC16G-SW, FC16G-LW PatchCableOIFCompat needs entries like: FCxx-SW - 2xMMF(1,2,3,4 - OM1/2/3/4) FCxx-LW - 2xSMF(5,6 - OS1/2) PortInterfaceCompat needs entries like: FC-SFP+, Empty FC-SFP+ FC-SFP+, FCxxG-xW (2/4/8/16 and SW/LW) PortCompat needs entries like: FC2G-SW - FC1/2/4G-SW - not sure whether to bother with 1G? FC2G-LW - FC1/2/4G-LW FC4G-SW - FC2/4/8/16G-SW - not sure where 1G compat goes away, may vary... FC4G-LW - FC2/4/8/16G-LW FC8G-SW - FC2/4/8/16G-SW FC8G-LW - FC2/4/8/16G-LW FC16G-SW - FC4/8/16G-SW - not sure where 2G compat goes away, may vary... FC16G-LW - FC4/8/16G-LW | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
This request is generally reasonable but the suggested mappings need to be carefully studied before adding to avoid unnecessary complications in future. | |
Would love to help with this. The interface types listed above appear generally correct - what remains? | |
Although one thing I should mention is that 32Gb fiber channel has hit the market recently - that should be accounted for as well. | |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2015-11-25 01:07 | bpothier | New Issue | |
2016-01-08 12:22 | infrastation | Note Added: 0003101 | |
2017-02-09 12:02 | infrastation | Status | new => acknowledged |
2017-06-23 16:02 | twielgos | Note Added: 0003637 | |
2017-06-23 16:03 | twielgos | Note Added: 0003639 |