View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
301 | RackTables | default | public | 2009-12-24 18:04 | 2011-06-28 15:31 |
Reporter | Assigned To | ||||
Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Target Version | 0.19.5 | Fixed in Version | 0.19.5 | ||
Summary | 301: better treatment of "reserved" ports | ||||
Description | "Reserved" ports are currently omitted from the list of "spare" ports in pop-up. To link such ports, one needs to open the "opposite" object and to remove the reservation. What is proposed is that with LINK_SPARE_PORTS set to "on" such "reserved" ports could be also listed in the SELECT. Upon clicking the "Link" and reaching linkPortForObject() such reservation, if it exists, shall be removed, and the link recorded the normal way. This trick would save time in environments, which assume, that reserved ports end up either linked or freed back up. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2009-12-24 18:04 |
|
New Issue | |
2009-12-26 17:10 |
|
Status | new => closed |
2010-01-09 22:24 | infrastation | Status | closed => new |
2010-01-09 22:24 | infrastation | Category | => Database - core |
2010-01-09 22:24 | infrastation | Description Updated | |
2010-01-10 13:38 | infrastation | Note Added: 0000004 | |
2010-01-10 13:38 | infrastation | Note Edited: 0000004 | |
2011-06-28 15:31 | andriyanov | Note Added: 0000349 | |
2011-06-28 15:31 | andriyanov | Status | new => closed |
2011-06-28 15:31 | andriyanov | Resolution | open => fixed |
2011-06-28 15:31 | andriyanov | Fixed in Version | => 0.19.5 |
2011-06-28 15:31 | andriyanov | Target Version | => 0.19.5 |